On 01/30/2012 06:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
My timer-fu is weak so I'm not going to claim to have actually
reviewed these, but they don't look to be obviously wrong.
Are you hoping for these to go in via the arm-devs tree?
Yes...
You'll need to rebase following the QOM series landing.
Gah,
On 30 January 2012 16:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 01:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> This series uses rtc_clock uniformly in device models that provide RTC
>> functionality. This will let users choose the desired semantics for
>> the clock.
>>
>> This is most important with qtest, whe
On 01/20/2012 01:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
This series uses rtc_clock uniformly in device models that provide RTC
functionality. This will let users choose the desired semantics for
the clock.
This is most important with qtest, where "-rtc clock=vm" will provide
determinism and let you run te
This series uses rtc_clock uniformly in device models that provide RTC
functionality. This will let users choose the desired semantics for
the clock.
This is most important with qtest, where "-rtc clock=vm" will provide
determinism and let you run tests that fake execution for large time
periods.
