On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:34:24AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:02:00PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > This series is an attempt to make the compat_props lists from the PC code
> > reusable by other machine-types. All the compat bits that are on those
> > lists
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:02:00PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This series is an attempt to make the compat_props lists from the PC code
> reusable by other machine-types. All the compat bits that are on those lists
> are
> not tied to a specific machine-type, but instead to the device code th
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:39:39PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 04:02 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > This series is an attempt to make the compat_props lists from the PC code
> > reusable by other machine-types. All the compat bits that are on those
> > lists are
> > not tied
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:02:00PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This series is an attempt to make the compat_props lists from the PC code
> reusable by other machine-types. All the compat bits that are on those lists
> are
> not tied to a specific machine-type, but instead to the device code th
On 06/25/2014 04:02 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This series is an attempt to make the compat_props lists from the PC code
> reusable by other machine-types. All the compat bits that are on those lists
> are
> not tied to a specific machine-type, but instead to the device code that was
> present o
This series is an attempt to make the compat_props lists from the PC code
reusable by other machine-types. All the compat bits that are on those lists are
not tied to a specific machine-type, but instead to the device code that was
present on a given QEMU version.
The last patch is a proposal to s
