On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:59:29 +0200
Michael Fritscher wrote:
> Am 02.06.2016 um 11:42 schrieb Greg Kurz:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:33:06 +0100
> > Peter Maydell wrote:
> >
> >> On 2 June 2016 at 09:51, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>> The readdir_r() function has a broken design and should not be used
Am 02.06.2016 um 11:42 schrieb Greg Kurz:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:33:06 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 June 2016 at 09:51, Greg Kurz wrote:
The readdir_r() function has a broken design and should not be used anymore.
It is expected to be obsoleted in a future version of POSIX.1:
http://austi
On 2 June 2016 at 10:42, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:33:06 +0100
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> AIUI the argument is that all sensible implementations of readdir()
>> already provide the thread-safety guarantees POSIX is going to
>> specify, but have you tested this on one of the BSDs or
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:33:06 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 June 2016 at 09:51, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > The readdir_r() function has a broken design and should not be used anymore.
> > It is expected to be obsoleted in a future version of POSIX.1:
> >
> > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=69
On 2 June 2016 at 09:51, Greg Kurz wrote:
> The readdir_r() function has a broken design and should not be used anymore.
> It is expected to be obsoleted in a future version of POSIX.1:
>
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=696#c2857
>
> Glibc has already announced that 2.24 (scheduled for Au
The readdir_r() function has a broken design and should not be used anymore.
It is expected to be obsoleted in a future version of POSIX.1:
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=696#c2857
Glibc has already announced that 2.24 (scheduled for August 2016) will
deprecates readdir_r() and encourages
