On 21 November 2012 18:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-11-21 09:09, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Not sure if this fits our current Hard Freeze definition though. ;)
>
> How often do I need to ping patches to get them applied?
> I've generally been waiting 1-2 weeks between pings.
> I've got at
On 2012-11-21 09:09, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Not sure if this fits our current Hard Freeze definition though. ;)
How often do I need to ping patches to get them applied?
I've generally been waiting 1-2 weeks between pings.
I've got at least 5 minor patch sets outstanding, dating
back to at least l
Am 21.11.2012 17:51, schrieb Richard Henderson:
> Ping.
I had a brief look at these when you posted this, and it's generally
fine with me. I just didn't get around to testing/verifying yet.
Not sure if this fits our current Hard Freeze definition though. ;)
Andreas
>
> On 2012-11-01 14:36, Ric
Ping.
On 2012-11-01 14:36, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Best I can figure, these temporaries were used by the dyngen
> code generator, last seen in qemu 0.9.0. Certainly there are
> no references to these members remaining.
>
> Built x86_64 and i686 hosts.
>
>
> r~
>
>
> Richard Henderson (3):
Best I can figure, these temporaries were used by the dyngen
code generator, last seen in qemu 0.9.0. Certainly there are
no references to these members remaining.
Built x86_64 and i686 hosts.
r~
Richard Henderson (3):
target-alpha: Remove t0, t1 from CPUAlphaState
target-m68k: Remove t1
