On 25.03.2015 04:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 March 2015 at 01:43, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 24.03.2015 18:30, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>> So if I understand you correctly, it would be suitable to implement a
>>> model like Juno ARM Development Platform in order to get AArch64 VE
>>> model w
On 25 March 2015 at 01:43, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 24.03.2015 18:30, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> So if I understand you correctly, it would be suitable to implement a
>> model like Juno ARM Development Platform in order to get AArch64 VE
>> model with SMP support in system mode?
>
> As you can gue
On 24.03.2015 18:30, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 24.03.2015 17:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 25 March 2015 at 00:31, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>> On 24.03.2015 17:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 March 2015 at 00:18, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> This model uses spin table boot method.
Yes,
On 24.03.2015 17:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 March 2015 at 00:31, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 24.03.2015 17:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 25 March 2015 at 00:18, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
This model uses spin table boot method.
>>> Yes, I noticed, that's a strong reason why I don't want t
On 25 March 2015 at 00:31, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 24.03.2015 17:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 25 March 2015 at 00:18, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>> This model uses spin table boot method.
>> Yes, I noticed, that's a strong reason why I don't want to
>> add it if we can avoid it :-)
>
> Why not?
On 24.03.2015 17:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 March 2015 at 00:18, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> This model uses spin table boot method.
> Yes, I noticed, that's a strong reason why I don't want to
> add it if we can avoid it :-)
Why not? :-)
>
>> So it enables SMP on AArch64 in TCG mode.
> We al
On 25 March 2015 at 00:18, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> This model uses spin table boot method.
Yes, I noticed, that's a strong reason why I don't want to
add it if we can avoid it :-)
> So it enables SMP on AArch64 in TCG mode.
We already support SMP on AArch64 in TCG mode using PSCI.
-- PMM
On 24.03.2015 17:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 March 2015 at 23:55, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> These patches add support for ARM Fixed Virtual Platform Versatile Express
>> board. ARM VFP VE is similar to hardware Versatile Express boards. So these
>> changes rely largely on existing QEMU VE su
On 24 March 2015 at 23:55, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> These patches add support for ARM Fixed Virtual Platform Versatile Express
> board. ARM VFP VE is similar to hardware Versatile Express boards. So these
> changes rely largely on existing QEMU VE support code. First two patches are
> prerequisites
These patches add support for ARM Fixed Virtual Platform Versatile Express
board. ARM VFP VE is similar to hardware Versatile Express boards. So these
changes rely largely on existing QEMU VE support code. First two patches are
prerequisites for the final patch which adds FVP VE board support itsel
10 matches
Mail list logo
