On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:56:53PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Dan Kenigsberg a écrit :
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I have some newby's questions: is a speedup expected, comparing to ide
> >
> > We should have a speedup.
>
> Would you
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Dan Kenigsberg a écrit :
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have some newby's questions: is a speedup expected, comparing to ide
>
> We should have a speedup.
Would you suggest where it could show? I was trying simple dd and
bonnie++, and saw big var
Dan Kenigsberg a écrit :
Hi,
I have some newby's questions: is a speedup expected, comparing to ide
We should have a speedup.
But an improvement can also be to interface a _real_ SCSI disk and send directly
to it the SCSI commands generated by the _virtual_ SCSI interface (as it is done
in B
Hi,
I have some newby's questions: is a speedup expected, comparing to ide
(I didn't notice any)? Can the PC boot from a SCSI-mounted device (I did
not succeede)?
Hi,
I know this has already been tried, but I hope this time I have the good
approach: this series of 3 patches introduces the support of SCSI devices for
the
PC target (and try to break nothing existing).
[PATCH 1/3] Add args to -cdrom to define where is connected the cdrom
This patch allo