* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:13:51PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 4/12/19 7:20 AM, Yury Kotov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've added 'inline-fd:' proto to simplify migration to/from fd.
> > > I thought about modifying the existing 'fd:' proto b
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:13:51PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 4/12/19 7:20 AM, Yury Kotov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've added 'inline-fd:' proto to simplify migration to/from fd.
> > I thought about modifying the existing 'fd:' proto but I'm not sure it's a
> > good idea to change it's contract.
On 4/12/19 7:20 AM, Yury Kotov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added 'inline-fd:' proto to simplify migration to/from fd.
> I thought about modifying the existing 'fd:' proto but I'm not sure it's a
> good idea to change it's contract.
>
> Existing 'fd:' proto works with previously added fd by getfd or add
Hi,
I've added 'inline-fd:' proto to simplify migration to/from fd.
I thought about modifying the existing 'fd:' proto but I'm not sure it's a
good idea to change it's contract.
Existing 'fd:' proto works with previously added fd by getfd or add-fd commands.
If client doesn't want to work with th