On 08/11/2016 20:41, Vincent Palatin wrote:
> > If so, I think we should only support those
> > processors and slash all the part related to HAX_EMULATE_STATE_INITIAL
> > and HAX_EMULATE_STATE_REAL. This would probably let us make patch 3
> > much less intrusive.
>
> Sure the whole patchset w
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/11/2016 16:39, Vincent Palatin wrote:
> > I took a stab at trying to rebase/upstream the support for Intel HAXM.
> > (Hardware Accelerated Execution Manager).
> > Intel HAX is kernel-based hardware acceleration module for Windows a
On 08/11/2016 16:39, Vincent Palatin wrote:
> I took a stab at trying to rebase/upstream the support for Intel HAXM.
> (Hardware Accelerated Execution Manager).
> Intel HAX is kernel-based hardware acceleration module for Windows and MacOSX.
>
> I have based my work on the last version of the so
I took a stab at trying to rebase/upstream the support for Intel HAXM.
(Hardware Accelerated Execution Manager).
Intel HAX is kernel-based hardware acceleration module for Windows and MacOSX.
I have based my work on the last version of the source code I found:
the emu-2.2-release branch in the ext
