On 11/8/18 8:12 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> * We don't take advantage of the ordering bits on fences, which could allow us
> to emit less conservative fences. This would presumably increase
> performance.
Yes.
> * We treat fences as NOPs under "#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY", which is a bug.
Ah y
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:29:26 PST (-0800), Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
On 11/8/18 4:53 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/8/18 1:06 PM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
while going through the reviews of the riscv-decodetree patches, two bugs came
up that I fix here. There is one more problem [1] mentio
On 11/8/18 4:53 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/8/18 1:06 PM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
while going through the reviews of the riscv-decodetree patches, two bugs came
up that I fix here. There is one more problem [1] mentioned by Richard but
I don't have the time to investigate it further.
On 11/8/18 1:06 PM, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
> while going through the reviews of the riscv-decodetree patches, two bugs came
> up that I fix here. There is one more problem [1] mentioned by Richard but
> I don't have the time to investigate it further.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch
Hi,
while going through the reviews of the riscv-decodetree patches, two bugs came
up that I fix here. There is one more problem [1] mentioned by Richard but
I don't have the time to investigate it further.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10650293/
Bastian Koppelmann (2):
target/riscv:
