Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-06-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-06-12 16:12, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Thursday, June 4, 2015 10:55:12 PM EEST, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >On 2015-06-02 21:50, Richard Henderson wrote: > >>On 05/24/2015 03:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > > >I have added them in my sh4-next branch [1], they will be in the next > >pull requ

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-06-12 Thread Riku Voipio
On Thursday, June 4, 2015 10:55:12 PM EEST, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2015-06-02 21:50, Richard Henderson wrote: On 05/24/2015 03:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... I have added them in my sh4-next branch [1], they will be in the next pull request. [1] http://git.aurel32.net/?p=qemu.git;a=sho

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-06-04 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-06-02 21:50, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 05/24/2015 03:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >On 2015-05-23 15:06, Richard Henderson wrote: > >>As reported by Rich the other day. As I don't have a user-land > >>binary that depends on this, I merely note that it still runs > >>the linux-user-tes

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-06-02 Thread Richard Henderson
On 05/24/2015 03:51 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2015-05-23 15:06, Richard Henderson wrote: As reported by Rich the other day. As I don't have a user-land binary that depends on this, I merely note that it still runs the linux-user-test sh4 binary. And gdb confirms that the LLSC bit does get s

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-05-24 Thread Rich Felker
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 03:06:52PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > As reported by Rich the other day. As I don't have a user-land > binary that depends on this, I merely note that it still runs > the linux-user-test sh4 binary. And gdb confirms that the LLSC > bit does get set. > > Rich, can

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-05-24 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-05-23 15:06, Richard Henderson wrote: > As reported by Rich the other day. As I don't have a user-land > binary that depends on this, I merely note that it still runs > the linux-user-test sh4 binary. And gdb confirms that the LLSC > bit does get set. How would you like to see this patc

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] sh4 linux-user cpu and hwcap

2015-05-23 Thread Richard Henderson
As reported by Rich the other day. As I don't have a user-land binary that depends on this, I merely note that it still runs the linux-user-test sh4 binary. And gdb confirms that the LLSC bit does get set. Rich, can you confirm that this is good enough for your musl test? r~ Richard Henders