On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:08:05AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:36:03PM -0200, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:
> > The first patch unfolds parts of qemu_ram_mmap() to make it clearer.
> > No changes in the function behaviour.
> >
> > The second one fixes the alignment of t
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:36:03PM -0200, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:
> The first patch unfolds parts of qemu_ram_mmap() to make it clearer.
> No changes in the function behaviour.
>
> The second one fixes the alignment of the length given to munmap().
>
> I am pretty sure there is room for im
The first patch unfolds parts of qemu_ram_mmap() to make it clearer.
No changes in the function behaviour.
The second one fixes the alignment of the length given to munmap().
I am pretty sure there is room for improvement, so I would love to
hear your feedback.
Thank you!
Murilo Opsfelder Arauj