Eric Blake writes:
> Passing around an 'int' for a QBool type is weird, when we already
> use a C99 compiler and have a sane 'bool' that does just fine.
>
> I half-debated sending this through qemu-trivial, but think it
> better belongs through the QMP tree. There turned out to be few
> enough c
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:54:12 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2015 16:24:58 -0600
> Eric Blake wrote:
>
> > Passing around an 'int' for a QBool type is weird, when we already
> > use a C99 compiler and have a sane 'bool' that does just fine.
> >
> > I half-debated sending this thr
On Fri, 15 May 2015 16:24:58 -0600
Eric Blake wrote:
> Passing around an 'int' for a QBool type is weird, when we already
> use a C99 compiler and have a sane 'bool' that does just fine.
>
> I half-debated sending this through qemu-trivial, but think it
> better belongs through the QMP tree. Th
Passing around an 'int' for a QBool type is weird, when we already
use a C99 compiler and have a sane 'bool' that does just fine.
I half-debated sending this through qemu-trivial, but think it
better belongs through the QMP tree. There turned out to be few
enough clients that I grouped it into tw
