Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce QemuRWLock

2011-10-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-10-03 19:30, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:16:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Non-text part: multipart/signed >> On 2011-10-03 13:23, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote: >>> SynthFS uses rwlocks, which raise the need of a generic QemuRWLock APIs. >>> This patchset introduces the sam

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce QemuRWLock

2011-10-03 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:16:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On 2011-10-03 13:23, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote: > > SynthFS uses rwlocks, which raise the need of a generic QemuRWLock APIs. > > This patchset introduces the same making necessary changes to relevant code. > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce QemuRWLock

2011-10-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-10-03 13:23, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote: > SynthFS uses rwlocks, which raise the need of a generic QemuRWLock APIs. > This patchset introduces the same making necessary changes to relevant code. Is the impact of using a plain mutex measurable with 9pfs? Usually it takes very heavy write sect

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce QemuRWLock

2011-10-03 Thread Harsh Prateek Bora
SynthFS uses rwlocks, which raise the need of a generic QemuRWLock APIs. This patchset introduces the same making necessary changes to relevant code. Harsh Prateek Bora (2): Introduce QemuRWLock Use qemu_rwlock_* interface instead of pthread_rwlock_* hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-synth.c | 23