Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] s390 files gplv2 or later

2012-11-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 19.11.2012, at 19:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 19/11/2012 18:31, Alexander Graf ha scritto: >> Given that GPLv2 only code is compatible with LGPLv2+, can't you just >> declare all IBM s390x code to be GPLv2 only? > > What Christian did matches what we have done for all files, so I'd > prefer

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] s390 files gplv2 or later

2012-11-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 19/11/2012 18:31, Alexander Graf ha scritto: > Given that GPLv2 only code is compatible with LGPLv2+, can't you just > declare all IBM s390x code to be GPLv2 only? What Christian did matches what we have done for all files, so I'd prefer that. Paolo > Then the rest should > solve itself autom

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] s390 files gplv2 or later

2012-11-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 12.11.2012, at 12:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > IBMs s390 contributions were meant to to be gplv2 or later (since > we were contributing to qemu). Several of the s390 specific files > link to gpl code anyway so the ones in qemu repository will have > a hard time being strictly LGPL. > So

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] s390 files gplv2 or later

2012-11-12 Thread Christian Borntraeger
IBMs s390 contributions were meant to to be gplv2 or later (since we were contributing to qemu). Several of the s390 specific files link to gpl code anyway so the ones in qemu repository will have a hard time being strictly LGPL. So lets clarify the licence statement for new contributions for thos