Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] zero/NULL fixes.

2008-01-09 Thread Thayne Harbaugh
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:14 -0300, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > I think these patches are important bugfixes and they should be > applied on the qemu head. > They fix some LTP tests. Tonight I'll be pulling my local tree up to CVS current and I'll resend any remaining EFAULT and zero/NULL patche

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] zero/NULL fixes.

2008-01-09 Thread Lauro Ramos Venancio
I think these patches are important bugfixes and they should be applied on the qemu head. They fix some LTP tests. Lauro 2007/12/11, Thayne Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The EFAULT changes use a result of NULL to detect a failure from lock*() > functions. There are syscalls that accept NULL as

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] zero/NULL fixes.

2007-12-11 Thread Thayne Harbaugh
The EFAULT changes use a result of NULL to detect a failure from lock*() functions. There are syscalls that accept NULL as a valid argument and now the syscalls return -EFAULT. These patches allow appropriate syscalls to accept NULL. I have put together a regression test harness wrapped around t