On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Those functions are missing in MinGW.
>
> Some versions of MinGW-w64 include defines for gmtime_r and localtime_r.
> Older versions of these macros are buggy (they return a pointer to a
> static variable), therefore we don't want them. Newer ve
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> Those functions are missing in MinGW.
>>>
>>> Some versions of MinGW-w64 include defines for gmtime_r and localtime_r.
>>> Older versions of these macros are buggy (they return a pointer
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Those functions are missing in MinGW.
>>
>> Some versions of MinGW-w64 include defines for gmtime_r and localtime_r.
>> Older versions of these macros are buggy (they return a pointer to a
>> static variable), therefore we don't want them. N
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Those functions are missing in MinGW.
>
> Some versions of MinGW-w64 include defines for gmtime_r and localtime_r.
> Older versions of these macros are buggy (they return a pointer to a
> static variable), therefore we don't want them. Newer ve
Those functions are missing in MinGW.
Some versions of MinGW-w64 include defines for gmtime_r and localtime_r.
Older versions of these macros are buggy (they return a pointer to a
static variable), therefore we don't want them. Newer versions are
similar to the code used here, but without the mems
