On 02/08/2016 09:23 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 19:59, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/08/2016 06:47 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 13:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/08/2016 02:22 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 12:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
Also we can use current machine
On 02/08/16 19:59, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 02/08/2016 06:47 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/08/16 13:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>> On 02/08/2016 02:22 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 12:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Also we can use current machine properties instead of querying
On 02/08/2016 06:47 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 13:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 02/08/2016 02:22 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 12:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
Also we can use current machine properties instead of querying
machine's opts.
Why? :) For me at least, you'll have to
On 02/08/16 13:27, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 02/08/2016 02:22 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/08/16 12:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>> Also we can use current machine properties instead of querying
>>> machine's opts.
>>
>> Why? :) For me at least, you'll have to spell it out.
>
> The theory w
On 02/08/2016 02:22 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 02/08/16 12:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
Also we can use current machine properties instead of querying machine's opts.
Why? :) For me at least, you'll have to spell it out.
The theory would be that is cleaner to call an object property than use
On 02/08/16 12:45, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Also we can use current machine properties instead of querying machine's opts.
Why? :) For me at least, you'll have to spell it out.
Thanks
Laszlo
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum
> ---
> vl.c | 9 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5
Also we can use current machine properties instead of querying machine's opts.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum
---
vl.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
index 5873248..c03a4fe 100644
--- a/vl.c
+++ b/vl.c
@@ -4353,11 +4353,10 @@ int main(in
