On 09/06/2013 12:50 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>> This is the patch to introduce SIGILL handler to be able to trigger
>> SIGSEGV signal in qemu. This has been written to help debugging
>> state when qemu crashes by SIGSEGV as a simple reprod
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> This is the patch to introduce SIGILL handler to be able to trigger
> SIGSEGV signal in qemu. This has been written to help debugging
> state when qemu crashes by SIGSEGV as a simple reproducer to
> emulate such situation in case of need.
>
>
On 09/05/2013 04:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> +int *p = NULL;
>> +
>> +*p = 0xDEADBEEF;
>
> I won't repeat the questions from Paolo and Lazlo (I share their
> confusion) but will simply add that you cannot rely on NULL address
> accessing causing a SEGV. Even with all the use of volat
On 09/05/13 15:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/09/2013 14:19, Michal Novotny ha scritto:
>> This is the patch to introduce SIGILL handler to be able to trigger
>> SIGSEGV signal in qemu. This has been written to help debugging
>> state when qemu crashes by SIGSEGV as a simple reproducer to
>> emul
Il 05/09/2013 14:19, Michal Novotny ha scritto:
> This is the patch to introduce SIGILL handler to be able to trigger
> SIGSEGV signal in qemu. This has been written to help debugging
> state when qemu crashes by SIGSEGV as a simple reproducer to
> emulate such situation in case of need.
What's wr
This is the patch to introduce SIGILL handler to be able to trigger
SIGSEGV signal in qemu. This has been written to help debugging
state when qemu crashes by SIGSEGV as a simple reproducer to
emulate such situation in case of need.
Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny
---
vl.c | 24 +++