Hi Eric,
On 2019/7/30 21:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 7/29/19 7:27 PM, piaojun wrote:
>> Use F_GETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK not defined.
>
> Which system are you hitting this problem on?
>
> The problem with F_GETLK is that it is NOT as safe as F_OFD_GETLK.
>
> We already have fcntl_op_getlk
On 7/29/19 7:27 PM, piaojun wrote:
> Use F_GETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK not defined.
Which system are you hitting this problem on?
The problem with F_GETLK is that it is NOT as safe as F_OFD_GETLK.
We already have fcntl_op_getlk and qemu_probe_lock_ops() in util/osdep.c
to not only determine
Hi Liam,
On 2019/7/30 20:22, Liam Merwick wrote:
> On 30/07/2019 01:27, piaojun wrote:
>> Use F_GETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK not defined.
>
>
> Use F_GETLK/F_SETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK/F_OFD_SETLK not defined.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jun Piao
>> ---
>> contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_
On 30/07/2019 01:27, piaojun wrote:
Use F_GETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK not defined.
Use F_GETLK/F_SETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK/F_OFD_SETLK not defined.
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao
---
contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/con
Use F_GETLK for fcntl when F_OFD_GETLK not defined.
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao
---
contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 9ae1381..757785b 100644
--- a/contrib/vir
