On 18/09/2017 11:37, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
>>>
>>
>> To understand the patch better this doesn't fix _all_ stopped states,
>> only migration, right? That said it's a valid bugfix even independent
>> of the effects for stopped runstate.
> Yes, the bug only appears on the migration. Actually, to pro
On 15.09.2017 20:09, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/07/2017 16:21, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RAM
On 07/07/2017 16:21, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
> We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
> state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
> migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RAM on
> source side will not be modified
On 17.07.2017 16:56, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
On 07.07.2017 17:21, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RA
On 07/07/2017 05:21 PM, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
> We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
> state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
> migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RAM on
> source side will not be modifi
On 07.07.2017 17:21, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RAM on
source side will not be modified as thi
On 10/07/2017 18:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:13:54PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> static void virtconsole_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> {
>>> VirtIOSerialPort *port = VIRTIO_SERIAL_PORT(dev);
>>> @@ -233,6 +253,7 @@ static void virtserialport_
On 10.07.2017 17:13, Laurent Vivier wrote:
On 07/07/2017 16:21, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RA
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:13:54PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > static void virtconsole_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > {
> > VirtIOSerialPort *port = VIRTIO_SERIAL_PORT(dev);
> > @@ -233,6 +253,7 @@ static void virtserialport_class_init(ObjectClass
> > *klass, void *data)
>
On 07/07/2017 16:21, Pavel Butsykin wrote:
> We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
> state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
> migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RAM on
> source side will not be modified
We should guarantee that RAM will not be modified while VM has a stopped
state, otherwise it can lead to negative consequences during post-copy
migration. In RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE step, it's expected that RAM on
source side will not be modified as this could lead to non-consistent vm state
on th
11 matches
Mail list logo