On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:25:34AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:19:42 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > On 04/04/2016 10:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > This will be fixed by Cornelia's rework, and is an example of why I
> > > > think patch 1/9 is a good idea (IOW, assign
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:19:42 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 10:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > This will be fixed by Cornelia's rework, and is an example of why I
> > > think patch 1/9 is a good idea (IOW, assign=false is harmful).
> >
> > So what do we want to do for 2.6? The aio hand
On 04/04/2016 10:10, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > This will be fixed by Cornelia's rework, and is an example of why I
> > think patch 1/9 is a good idea (IOW, assign=false is harmful).
>
> So what do we want to do for 2.6? The aio handler rework (without the
> cleanup) is needed. Do we want to inclu
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:13:28 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 21:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Thread 1 (Thread 0x3ffad25bb90 (LWP 41685)):
> > ---Type to continue, or q to quit---
> > #0 0x03ffab5be2c0 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> > #1 0x03ffab5bfc26 in abort ()
On 03/04/2016 21:59, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Thread 1 (Thread 0x3ffad25bb90 (LWP 41685)):
> ---Type to continue, or q to quit---
> #0 0x03ffab5be2c0 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1 0x03ffab5bfc26 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #2 0x03ffab5b5bce in __assert_fail_bas
On 04/03/2016 12:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Reentrancy cannot happen while the BQL is being held,
> so we should never enter this condition.
>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger
> Cc: Cornelia Huck
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> This is a replacement for [P
Reentrancy cannot happen while the BQL is being held,
so we should never enter this condition.
Cc: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Cornelia Huck
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
This is a replacement for [PATCH 9/9] virtio: remove starting/stopping
checks Christian, could you