Quoting Aneesh Kumar K.V (aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> Serge Hallyn writes:
>
> > If AT_EMPTY_PATH is not in one of the included files, go ahead and
> > define it. qemu won't compile on ubuntu for me without this.
> >
> > (Note - alternatively we could #include to pick
> > up the definit
Serge Hallyn writes:
> If AT_EMPTY_PATH is not in one of the included files, go ahead and
> define it. qemu won't compile on ubuntu for me without this.
>
> (Note - alternatively we could #include to pick
> up the definitions there)
Then why don't we do that ? I do get the below errors
In fil
If AT_EMPTY_PATH is not in one of the included files, go ahead and
define it. qemu won't compile on ubuntu for me without this.
(Note - alternatively we could #include to pick
up the definitions there)
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn
---
hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-handle.c |9 +
1 files change
