On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:57:48 -0700, Venkateswararao Jujjuri
wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 03:33 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:03:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-04-27 08:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>> Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
> >>> it make
On 04/27/2011 03:33 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:03:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-04-27 08:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
it make sense to move them to a separate directory
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
Makef
On 2011-04-27 12:33, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:03:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-04-27 08:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
>>> it make sense to move them to a separate directory
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:03:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-27 08:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
> > it make sense to move them to a separate directory
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> > ---
> > Makefile.objs
On 2011-04-27 08:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
> it make sense to move them to a separate directory
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> ---
> Makefile.objs| 10 +++---
> Makefile.target |
Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
it make sense to move them to a separate directory
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
Makefile.objs| 10 +++---
Makefile.target |6 --
configure|2 ++
{