Il 26/06/2014 11:10, Damjan Marion (damarion) ha scritto:
Does it really make a sense to keep old broken code, which doesn’t work if VM
have more than 3 GB of RAM?
As Nikolay said yesterday:
> On the other hand there's no wide adoption of
> the protocol so it's still not critical to change it.
On 26 Jun 2014, at 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:55:03AM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
>> Old code was affected by memory gaps which
>> resulted in buffer pointers pointing to
>> address outside of the mapped regions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion
>> ---
>> d
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:55:03AM +0200, Damjan Marion wrote:
> Old code was affected by memory gaps which
> resulted in buffer pointers pointing to
> address outside of the mapped regions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion
> ---
> docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 7 ---
> exec.c
Old code was affected by memory gaps which
resulted in buffer pointers pointing to
address outside of the mapped regions.
Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion
---
docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 7 ---
exec.c| 7 +++
hw/virtio/vhost-user.c| 22 +-
includ
