On 08/24/2011 08:00 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-08-24 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/24/2011 03:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
+++ b/hw/vga.c
@@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ static void vga_update_memory_access(VGACommonState *s)
base = 0xb8000;
size = 0x8000;
b
On 08/24/2011 04:00 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-08-24 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 03:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> +++ b/hw/vga.c
>>> @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ static void vga_update_memory_access(VGACommonState
*s)
>>>base = 0xb8000;
>>>size = 0x8000
On 2011-08-24 14:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 03:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> +++ b/hw/vga.c
>>> @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ static void vga_update_memory_access(VGACommonState *s)
>>> base = 0xb8000;
>>> size = 0x8000;
>>> break;
>>> +default:
On 08/24/2011 03:46 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> +++ b/hw/vga.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ static void vga_update_memory_access(VGACommonState *s)
> base = 0xb8000;
> size = 0x8000;
> break;
> +default:
> +abort();
> }
>
On 2011-08-24 14:07, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Newer gcc complains that base and size may be used uninitialized, even though
> it is clearly a false warning.
Mmh, gcc is getting dumber again.
> Silence the warning by indicating to gcc that
> the code path triggering the warning cannot happen.
>
> Sig
Newer gcc complains that base and size may be used uninitialized, even though
it is clearly a false warning. Silence the warning by indicating to gcc that
the code path triggering the warning cannot happen.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity
---
hw/vga.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 de
