On 05/08/12 14:06, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
> the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
> tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer submitted. Doing
> this twice is (a) not correct and (b) c
Looks VERY good, ACK!
The DVD drive works now!
On May 8, 2012 at 2:06 PM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
> the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
> tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer
Looks good, ACK.
On 05/08/2012 02:06 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer submitted. Doing
this twice is (a) not
Most important here is to update our internal endpoint state so we know
the endpoint isn't in halted state any more. Without this usb-host
tries to clear halt again with the next data transfer submitted. Doing
this twice is (a) not correct and (b) confuses some usb devices,
rendering them non-fun
