On 03/31/2013 04:50 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > I'm a bit confused. This is the exact same algorithm that's used on ARM
>> > and
>> > i386. And as far as I can determine, all three platforms have the same
>> > definition of "overflow".
> I think it's not quite the same as ARM because the two a
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:50:58AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 April 2013 00:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013-03-30 16:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >>
> >> The overflow computation of nego and subf*o instructions has been broken
> >> in commit ffe30937. This patch fixes it.
> >>
> >>
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 04:19:45PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-03-30 16:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >The overflow computation of nego and subf*o instructions has been broken
> >in commit ffe30937. This patch fixes it.
> >
> >With this change the PPC emulation passes the Gwenole Beauch
On 1 April 2013 00:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2013-03-30 16:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>
>> The overflow computation of nego and subf*o instructions has been broken
>> in commit ffe30937. This patch fixes it.
>>
>> With this change the PPC emulation passes the Gwenole Beauchesne
>> testsuit
On 2013-03-30 16:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The overflow computation of nego and subf*o instructions has been broken
in commit ffe30937. This patch fixes it.
With this change the PPC emulation passes the Gwenole Beauchesne
testsuite again.
Cc: Alexander Graf
Cc: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by
The overflow computation of nego and subf*o instructions has been broken
in commit ffe30937. This patch fixes it.
With this change the PPC emulation passes the Gwenole Beauchesne
testsuite again.
Cc: Alexander Graf
Cc: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
---
target-ppc/translate.c
