On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:30:54PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sign-extend the result of LWR, as is already done for LWL. This is necessary
> in the case where LWR loads the full word (i.e. the address is actually
> aligned). In the other cases, it is implementation defined whether the
> up
On 2013-01-20 11:30, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Sign-extend the result of LWR, as is already done for LWL. This is necessary
in the case where LWR loads the full word (i.e. the address is actually
aligned). In the other cases, it is implementation defined whether the
upper 32 bits of the result a
Sign-extend the result of LWR, as is already done for LWL. This is necessary
in the case where LWR loads the full word (i.e. the address is actually
aligned). In the other cases, it is implementation defined whether the
upper 32 bits of the result are unchanged or a copy of bit 31. The latter
se
