On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 05:16:55AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Eduardo Habkost"
> > To: "Richard Henderson"
> > Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] target-i386: fix con
- Original Message -
> From: "Eduardo Habkost"
> To: "Richard Henderson"
> Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] target-i386: fix confusion in xcr0 bit position vs. mask
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:14:44AM -0
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:14:44AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 02:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > The xsave and xrstor helpers are accessing the x86_ext_save_areas array
> > using a bit mask instead of a bit position. Provide two sets of XSTATE_*
> > definitions and use XSTATE_
On 02/22/2016 02:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The xsave and xrstor helpers are accessing the x86_ext_save_areas array
> using a bit mask instead of a bit position. Provide two sets of XSTATE_*
> definitions and use XSTATE_*_BIT when a bit position is requested.
Whoops. This patch is fine,
Revi
The xsave and xrstor helpers are accessing the x86_ext_save_areas array
using a bit mask instead of a bit position. Provide two sets of XSTATE_*
definitions and use XSTATE_*_BIT when a bit position is requested.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
target-i386/cpu.c| 29 ++--
