On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 29.06.2012 08:41, schrieb Dunrong Huang:
>>
>> Commit c4baa0503d9623f1ce891f525ccd140c598bc29a improved SSE table type
>> safety but raises compile error of incompatible pointer type. Fix it by
>> casting to correct function type Signed-off-
Am 29.06.2012 08:41, schrieb Dunrong Huang:
Commit c4baa0503d9623f1ce891f525ccd140c598bc29a improved SSE table
type safety but raises compile error of incompatible pointer type. Fix
it by casting to correct function type Signed-off-by: Dunrong Huang
--- target-i386/translate.c | 22
++
2012/6/29 Andreas Färber :
> Am 29.06.2012 08:41, schrieb Dunrong Huang:
>> Commit c4baa0503d9623f1ce891f525ccd140c598bc29a improved SSE table type
>> safety but raises compile error of incompatible pointer type.
>
> What's the difference between the signatures?
>
The SSEFunc_0_pi is declared as:
t
Am 29.06.2012 08:41, schrieb Dunrong Huang:
> Commit c4baa0503d9623f1ce891f525ccd140c598bc29a improved SSE table type
> safety but raises compile error of incompatible pointer type.
What's the difference between the signatures?
Regards,
Andreas
> Fix it by casting to correct function type
>
> S
Commit c4baa0503d9623f1ce891f525ccd140c598bc29a improved SSE table type
safety but raises compile error of incompatible pointer type.
Fix it by casting to correct function type
Signed-off-by: Dunrong Huang
---
target-i386/translate.c | 22 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(
