On 22 October 2011 11:33, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 22.10.2011 12:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 3 October 2011 11:32, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> -#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136 0x4117b363
>>> -#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R2 0x4107b362
>>> +#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R1P3 0x4117b363
>>> +#define A
Am 22.10.2011 12:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 3 October 2011 11:32, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> -#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136 0x4117b363
>> -#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R2 0x4107b362
>> +#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R1P3 0x4117b363
>> +#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R0P2 0x4107b362
>
> I don't think the
On 3 October 2011 11:32, Andreas Färber wrote:
> -#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136 0x4117b363
> -#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R2 0x4107b362
> +#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R1P3 0x4117b363
> +#define ARM_CPUID_ARM1136_R0P2 0x4107b362
I don't think the patchlevels are important enough to
memorialise in the
Am 03.10.2011 12:32, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> -cpu arm1136-r2 is commented to in fact be ARM1136 r0p2, whereas
> -cpu arm1136 seems to be ARM1136 r1p3 according to the MIDR value.
>
> The CPUID values contain major and minor revision numbers (rnpn) and
> are never used with a mask, so are specifi
-cpu arm1136-r2 is commented to in fact be ARM1136 r0p2, whereas
-cpu arm1136 seems to be ARM1136 r1p3 according to the MIDR value.
The CPUID values contain major and minor revision numbers (rnpn) and
are never used with a mask, so are specific to the chosen revision.
Rename the CPUID preprocessor