On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Ryota Ozaki
>
> The title of your patch is incorrect, you specified A53 when you really mean
> A57
Definitely. I'm sorry for my fault (I found this problem when I w
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ryota Ozaki
The title of your patch is incorrect, you specified A53 when you really mean A57
> ---
> target-arm/cpu64.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu64.c b/target-arm/cpu64.c
> index
Signed-off-by: Ryota Ozaki
---
target-arm/cpu64.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/target-arm/cpu64.c b/target-arm/cpu64.c
index 823c739..270bc2f 100644
--- a/target-arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target-arm/cpu64.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static void aarch64_a57_initfn(Object *obj)
{
ARMCP
