Since you wanted a "no, because..." there's at least
one :-)
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Filip Navara wrote:
> While most of the ARMv5 instructions are backward compatible with ARMv4, there
> are few important differences. Most notably the stack pop and load
> instructions
> ignore the lowes
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:32:37PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:41:43PM +0100, Filip Navara wrote:
> > > While most of the ARMv5 instructions are backward compatible with
> ARMv4, there
> > > are few import
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:32:37PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:41:43PM +0100, Filip Navara wrote:
> > While most of the ARMv5 instructions are backward compatible with ARMv4,
> > there
> > are few important differences. Most notably the stack pop and load
> > inst
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:41:43PM +0100, Filip Navara wrote:
> While most of the ARMv5 instructions are backward compatible with ARMv4, there
> are few important differences. Most notably the stack pop and load
> instructions
> ignore the lowest bit, which is used by ARMv5 to switch to Thumb mode
While most of the ARMv5 instructions are backward compatible with ARMv4, there
are few important differences. Most notably the stack pop and load instructions
ignore the lowest bit, which is used by ARMv5 to switch to Thumb mode. A
base-updated data-abort model is used on ARM7TDMI, CP15 coprocessor
