On 19.10.2015 20:04, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/19/2015 01:04 AM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 19.10.2015 01:46, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 10/16/2015 04:08 AM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10/19/2015 01:04 AM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
On 19.10.2015 01:46, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/16/2015 04:08 AM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson
wrote:
On 10/15
On 19.10.2015 01:46, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 04:08 AM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydel
On 10/16/2015 04:08 AM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
This is still the same cryptic comment we have in the
t
On 16.10.2015 19:36, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 16.10.2015 17:08, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
On 16.10.2015 17:08, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This is still the same cryptic comment we hav
On 16.10.2015 04:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
This is still the same cryptic comment we have in the
targets which do do this. Can
On 16 October 2015 at 02:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Heh. Fair enough. How about
>
> /* The address covered by the breakpoint must be included in
> [tb->pc, tb->pc + tb->size) in order to for it to be
> properly cleared -- thus we increment the PC here so that
> the logic set
On 10/16/2015 03:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
This is still the same cryptic comment we have in the
targets which do do this. Can we have something
that is a bit more explanatory about what is go
On 14 October 2015 at 22:02, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> This is still the same cryptic comment we have in the
>> targets which do do this. Can we have something
>> that is a bit more explanatory about what is going on and
>> why we need to do this
On 10/15/2015 06:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
This is still the same cryptic comment we have in the
targets which do do this. Can we have something
that is a bit more explanatory about what is going on and
why we need to do this, please?
Suggestions?
(Also explaining what the number you need t
On 13 October 2015 at 23:10, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Some targets already had this within their logic, but make sure
> it's present for all targets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target-alpha/translate.c | 3 +++
> target-cris/translate.c | 3 +++
> target-i386/trans
On 14.10.2015 01:10, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Some targets already had this within their logic, but make sure
> it's present for all targets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Reported-by: Sergey Fedorov
Thanks,
Sergey
> ---
> target-alpha/translate.c | 3 +++
> target-cris/translat
Some targets already had this within their logic, but make sure
it's present for all targets.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-alpha/translate.c | 3 +++
target-cris/translate.c | 3 +++
target-i386/translate.c | 3 +++
target-lm32/translate.c | 3 +++
target-m6
14 matches
Mail list logo
