On 20.06.2017 01:44, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 01:08 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> +/* Sanity check the function code and storage characteristic. */
>>> +if (fc > 1 || sc > 3) {
>>> +if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_AND_STORE_2)) {
>>> +goto spe
On 06/19/2017 01:08 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
+/* Sanity check the function code and storage characteristic. */
+if (fc > 1 || sc > 3) {
+if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_AND_STORE_2)) {
+goto spec_exception;
+}
+if (fc > 2 || sc > 4 || (fc =
On 06/19/2017 01:08 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
+/* Sanity check the function code and storage characteristic. */
+if (fc > 1 || sc > 3) {
+if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_AND_STORE_2)) {
+goto spec_exception;
+}
+if (fc > 2 || sc > 4 || (fc =
On 06/19/2017 02:52 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.06.2017 14:47, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 06/19/2017 02:41 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 19.06.2017 14:33, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 06/19/2017 02:05 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.06.2017 12:03, David Hilde
On 19.06.2017 14:47, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 02:41 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 19.06.2017 14:33, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2017 02:05 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 19.06.2017 12:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Hender
On 06/19/2017 02:41 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.06.2017 14:33, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 06/19/2017 02:05 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 19.06.2017 12:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
> There are no uses in a Linux system wit
On 19.06.2017 14:33, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 02:05 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 19.06.2017 12:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
There are no uses in a Linux system with which to test,
but it Looks Right by my reading
On 06/19/2017 02:05 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.06.2017 12:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> There are no uses in a Linux system with which to test,
>>> but it Looks Right by my reading of the PoO.
>>
>> I am using next.git/master with this p
On 19.06.2017 12:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> There are no uses in a Linux system with which to test,
>> but it Looks Right by my reading of the PoO.
>
> I am using next.git/master with this patch applied:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke
On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
> There are no uses in a Linux system with which to test,
> but it Looks Right by my reading of the PoO.
I am using next.git/master with this patch applied:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=8aa8680aa3
On 15.06.2017 22:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
> There are no uses in a Linux system with which to test,
> but it Looks Right by my reading of the PoO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target/s390x/helper.h | 1 +
> target/s390x/insn-data.def | 2 +
> target/s390x/mem_helper.
There are no uses in a Linux system with which to test,
but it Looks Right by my reading of the PoO.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/s390x/helper.h | 1 +
target/s390x/insn-data.def | 2 +
target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 189 +
target
12 matches
Mail list logo