On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2013-09-02 at 11:53 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > Several places in spice-core.c were using either g_malloc+snprintf
> > or snprintf+g_strdup to achieve the same result as g_strdup_printf.
>
> Patch looks good but fails
On Mo, 2013-09-02 at 11:53 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Several places in spice-core.c were using either g_malloc+snprintf
> or snprintf+g_strdup to achieve the same result as g_strdup_printf.
Patch looks good but fails checkpatch.pl due to long lines.
cheers,
Gerd
ack
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Several places in spice-core.c were using either g_malloc+snprintf
> or snprintf+g_strdup to achieve the same result as g_strdup_printf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau
> ---
> ui/spice-core.c | 22 --
>
Several places in spice-core.c were using either g_malloc+snprintf
or snprintf+g_strdup to achieve the same result as g_strdup_printf.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau
---
ui/spice-core.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui/spice-core.c
