On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:11 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 June 2014 14:35, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:12:44 +0200
> > Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
> >
> > Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino
>
> Thanks; applied directly to master as a buildfi
On 20 June 2014 14:35, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:12:44 +0200
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
>
> Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino
Thanks; applied directly to master as a buildfix.
-- PMM
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:12:44 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino
> ---
> hw/display/qxl.c | 2 +-
> ui/spice-display.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/display/qxl.c b/hw/display/qxl.c
> index 7
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
hw/display/qxl.c | 2 +-
ui/spice-display.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/display/qxl.c b/hw/display/qxl.c
index 736fd3c..d43aa49 100644
--- a/hw/display/qxl.c
+++ b/hw/display/qxl.c
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ static void int
On 20 March 2012 12:45, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Um, is it worth to watch/fix? Note that spice does
> not work on 32bits anyway, qemu segfaults at startup...
I've had conflicting answers about this -- the Spice FAQ says
it doesn't work on 32 bits but in this message:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:45:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 20.03.2012 15:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
> >ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
> >
> >This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
> >slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
>
> Um, is it wor
20.03.2012 15:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
Um, is it worth to watch/fix? Note that spice does
not work on 32bits anyway, qemu segfaults at
On 20 March 2012 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Also, isn't the ui/spice-display.c patch the same as this one from
>> me from a couple of weeks back?
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/145269/
>
> It is. Picked that one up instead.
>
> /me is confused, I through I had that one already and we ju
Hi,
> What's the roms/seabios change doing here?
Just a missing "git submodule update" and the diff from that sneaking in.
> Also, isn't the ui/spice-display.c patch the same as this one from
> me from a couple of weeks back?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/145269/
It is. Picked that one
On 20 March 2012 11:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
> ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
>
> This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
> slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
> ---
> roms/seabios | 2 +-
> ui/spice-
New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
roms/seabios |2 +-
ui/spice-display.c | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+),
11 matches
Mail list logo