On 12/5/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> >On 12/4/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I would be surprised if an SMP kernel actually worked on a multi CPU SS5.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Prepare for a surprise:
> >
> >
> >
> That's interesting because the
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/4/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be surprised if an SMP kernel actually worked on a multi CPU SS5.
Prepare for a surprise:
That's interesting because the fact that it works shows how inaccurate
the emulation is.
Now could you please r
On 12/4/07, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you want to make a 16
> > CPU, 64 Gb machine, define a QEMU specific machine. There are no real
> > 32 bit sparc systems like that.
>
> I believe the Cray CS6400 was a 64-way sparc32 machine with 16Gb ram.
> Admittedly it's a sun4d variant,
> If you want to make a 16
> CPU, 64 Gb machine, define a QEMU specific machine. There are no real
> 32 bit sparc systems like that.
I believe the Cray CS6400 was a 64-way sparc32 machine with 16Gb ram.
Admittedly it's a sun4d variant, not sun4m. I've no idea how much difference
(if any) that ma
Am 04.12.2007 um 00:53 schrieb Thiemo Seufer:
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
16 CPUs
On 12/4/07, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
> > > supported by the actual hardware.
> >
> > While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sp
On 12/4/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> >On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
> >>supported by the actual hardware.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >While it's not historically accurate to
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
> > supported by the actual hardware.
>
> While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
> 16 CPUs and 2 gigabytes of memory, it doesn'
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
16 CPUs and 2 gigabytes of memory, it doesn't b
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
> supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
16 CPUs and 2 gigabytes of memory, it doesn't break anything to have
this
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
Index: hw/sun4m.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/hw/sun4m.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -p -u -r1.66 sun4m.c
--- hw/sun4m.c 2 De
11 matches
Mail list logo
