>
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 4:37 PM
>
>
> On 17/12/2015 08:17, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >> On 16/12/2015 11:28, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >>> I'll move the global nmi_disabled into RTCState, then I have to
On 17/12/2015 08:17, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>> On 16/12/2015 11:28, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>> I'll move the global nmi_disabled into RTCState, then I have to add a global
>> RTCState
>>> Variable so that other C files can use the rtc_state->external_nmi_disabled.
>>
>> Hmm, I think it should be do
Hello Paolo,
>
>
> On 16/12/2015 11:28, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > I'll move the global nmi_disabled into RTCState, then I have to add a global
> RTCState
> > Variable so that other C files can use the rtc_state->external_nmi_disabled.
>
> Hmm, I think it should be done differently. This is a l
On 16/12/2015 11:28, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> I'll move the global nmi_disabled into RTCState, then I have to add a global
> RTCState
> Variable so that other C files can use the rtc_state->external_nmi_disabled.
Hmm, I think it should be done differently. This is a layering
violation, the NMI_
>
> On 15/12/2015 19:53, Radim Krcmar wrote:
> > 2015-12-15 05:43-0500, Paolo Bonzini:
> >>> Hi Paolo,
> >>>
> >>> /* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
> >>> struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> >>> ...
> >>> struct {
> >>> __u8 injected;
> >>> __u8 pending;
> >>> __u8 masked;
>
On 15/12/2015 19:53, Radim Krcmar wrote:
> 2015-12-15 05:43-0500, Paolo Bonzini:
>>> Hi Paolo,
>>>
>>> /* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
>>> struct kvm_vcpu_events {
>>> ...
>>> struct {
>>> __u8 injected;
>>> __u8 pending;
>>> __u8 masked;
>>> __u
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Radim Krcmar [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: introduce nmi disable bit handler for cmos
>
> 2015-12-15 05:43-0500, Paolo Bonzini:
> >> Hi Paolo,
> >>
> >> /* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
> >> struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> >> ...
> >
2015-12-15 05:43-0500, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> /* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
>> struct kvm_vcpu_events {
>> ...
>> struct {
>> __u8 injected;
>> __u8 pending;
>> __u8 masked;
>> __u8 pad;
>> } nmi;
>> ...
>>
>> I found that
> Hi Paolo,
>
> /* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
> struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> ...
> struct {
> __u8 injected;
> __u8 pending;
> __u8 masked;
> __u8 pad;
> } nmi;
> ...
>
> I found that the nmi.masked property does these enable or di
Hi Paolo,
/* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
struct kvm_vcpu_events {
...
struct {
__u8 injected;
__u8 pending;
__u8 masked;
__u8 pad;
} nmi;
...
I found that the nmi.masked property does these enable or disable NMI jobs.
S
> -Original Message-
> From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:ehabk...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 2:17 AM
> To: Gonglei (Arei)
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; pbonz...@redhat.com; r...@twiddle.net;
> ke...@koconnor.net; Huangpeng (Peter)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: introduce nmi dis
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:37 PM
> On 14/12/2015 14:27, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 14/12/2015 13:49, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >>> This patch introduce nmi disable bit handler to fix the problem
> >>> and make the emulate
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 09:15:46PM +0800, Gonglei wrote:
> The Non-Maskable Interrupt (NMI) Enable bit is 0x80 bit of
> Port 0x70 (and its aliases). This bit must be 0b to enable
> the hardware chipset to send a Non-Maskable Interrupt. When
> set to a 1b, NMI's are disabled. This bit is commonly ac
On 14/12/2015 14:27, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14/12/2015 13:49, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>> This patch introduce nmi disable bit handler to fix the problem
>>> and make the emulated CMOS like the real hardware.
>
> I think that this only works with -machine kernel_irqchip=o
>
> On 14/12/2015 13:49, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> >>> > > This patch introduce nmi disable bit handler to fix the problem
> >>> > > and make the emulated CMOS like the real hardware.
> >> >
> >> > I think that this only works with -machine kernel_irqchip=off, however.
> > IIRCC, the kernel_irqchip
On 14/12/2015 13:49, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>> > > This patch introduce nmi disable bit handler to fix the problem and
>>> > > make the emulated CMOS like the real hardware.
>> >
>> > I think that this only works with -machine kernel_irqchip=off, however.
> IIRCC, the kernel_irqchip is disabled
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for your comments firstly.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: introduce nmi disable bit handler for cmos
>
>
>
> On 12/12/2015 14:15, Gonglei wrote:
> > The Non-Maskable Interrupt (NMI) Enable bit is 0x80 bit of Port 0x70
> > (and its aliases). This bit must be 0b to enable the hardw
On 12/12/2015 14:15, Gonglei wrote:
> The Non-Maskable Interrupt (NMI) Enable bit is 0x80 bit of
> Port 0x70 (and its aliases). This bit must be 0b to enable
> the hardware chipset to send a Non-Maskable Interrupt. When
> set to a 1b, NMI's are disabled. This bit is commonly accessed
> by applica
The Non-Maskable Interrupt (NMI) Enable bit is 0x80 bit of
Port 0x70 (and its aliases). This bit must be 0b to enable
the hardware chipset to send a Non-Maskable Interrupt. When
set to a 1b, NMI's are disabled. This bit is commonly accessed
by applications, BIOS, and even the operating system since
19 matches
Mail list logo
