On 21/03/2015 16:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 March 2015 at 15:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> 32-bit PPC cannot do atomic operations on long long. Inside the loops,
>> we are already using local counters that are summed at the end of
>> the run---with one exception in rcu_read_stress_test: fix
Am 21.03.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> 32-bit PPC cannot do atomic operations on long long. Inside the loops,
> we are already using local counters that are summed at the end of
> the run---with one exception in rcu_read_stress_test: fix it to use
> the same technique. Then, use a mutex
On 21 March 2015 at 15:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 32-bit PPC cannot do atomic operations on long long. Inside the loops,
> we are already using local counters that are summed at the end of
> the run---with one exception in rcu_read_stress_test: fix it to use
> the same technique. Then, use a mut
32-bit PPC cannot do atomic operations on long long. Inside the loops,
we are already using local counters that are summed at the end of
the run---with one exception in rcu_read_stress_test: fix it to use
the same technique. Then, use a mutex to protect the global counts.
Performance does not mat
