Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu_ram_resize: document assumptions

2014-12-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 24/12/2014 13:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Wait, I thought the agreement was to first merge Igor's patches to > > generate the SSDT from C code, and then see if this was still necessary? > > To first *review* Igor's patches. > > I can't merge more ACPI code until I know how we are > han

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu_ram_resize: document assumptions

2014-12-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 24/12/2014 12:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Document that when using qemu_ram_resize for anything mapped into guest > > address space, it's the job of the resize function to update guest > > visible state. > > > > Signed

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu_ram_resize: document assumptions

2014-12-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 24/12/2014 12:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Document that when using qemu_ram_resize for anything mapped into guest > address space, it's the job of the resize function to update guest > visible state. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Adding a comment at dgilbert's request.

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu_ram_resize: document assumptions

2014-12-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Document that when using qemu_ram_resize for anything mapped into guest address space, it's the job of the resize function to update guest visible state. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- Adding a comment at dgilbert's request. This is a separate patch to avoid deferring merging the code its