On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:18:16PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/23/19 3:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:19:53PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> The existing qemu-nbd --partition code claims to handle logical
> >> partitions up to 8, since its introduction in 2008 (c
On 1/23/19 3:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:19:53PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The existing qemu-nbd --partition code claims to handle logical
>> partitions up to 8, since its introduction in 2008 (commit 7a5ca86).
>> However, the implementation is bogus (actual MBR
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:19:53PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> The existing qemu-nbd --partition code claims to handle logical
> partitions up to 8, since its introduction in 2008 (commit 7a5ca86).
> However, the implementation is bogus (actual MBR logical partitions
> form a sort of linked list, wi
The existing qemu-nbd --partition code claims to handle logical
partitions up to 8, since its introduction in 2008 (commit 7a5ca86).
However, the implementation is bogus (actual MBR logical partitions
form a sort of linked list, with one partition per extended table
entry, rather than four logical
