Il 17/04/2013 17:36, Hans de Goede ha scritto:
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure why all users of qemu_chr_fe_add_watch believe that the
>> watch will be one-shot. This is definitely not what g_io_create_watch
>> does...
>
> It is supposed to depend on the return value of the callback, if you
> return False
Ji,
On 04/16/2013 11:34 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 16/04/2013 11:15, Gerd Hoffmann ha scritto:
On 04/10/13 15:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
If we do not do this, remo
Il 16/04/2013 11:15, Gerd Hoffmann ha scritto:
> On 04/10/13 15:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
>> to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
>>
>> If we do not do this, removing the source will not finalize it and
On 04/10/13 15:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
> to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
>
> If we do not do this, removing the source will not finalize it and
> will not drop the "real" I/O watch source.
>
> Th
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Il 12/04/2013 11:24, Amit Shah ha scritto:
> Can you try multiple writes from the guest? At least 3-4? QEMU
> doesn't detect a backend getting closed right away (another bug), so
> the freeze doesn't trigger til qemu detects there's no chardev
> anymore.
All writes after the second will hang and
On (Thu) 11 Apr 2013 [10:58:30], Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 10/04/2013 19:59, Amit Shah ha scritto:
> > On (Wed) 10 Apr 2013 [15:23:27], Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
> >> to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
>
Il 10/04/2013 19:59, Amit Shah ha scritto:
> On (Wed) 10 Apr 2013 [15:23:27], Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
>> to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
>>
>> If we do not do this, removing the source will not finali
On (Wed) 10 Apr 2013 [15:23:27], Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
> to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
>
> If we do not do this, removing the source will not finalize it and
> will not drop the "real" I/O watch s
After attaching the source, we have to remove the reference we hold
to it, because we do not hold anymore a pointer to the source.
If we do not do this, removing the source will not finalize it and
will not drop the "real" I/O watch source.
This showed up when backporting the new flow control pat
10 matches
Mail list logo