On 05/01/2012 03:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:38:43PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/30/2012 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > cpuid eax should return the max leaf so that
> > > guests can find out the valid range.
> > > This matches Xen et al.
> > >
> >
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 03:38:43PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > cpuid eax should return the max leaf so that
> > guests can find out the valid range.
> > This matches Xen et al.
> >
> > Tested using -cpu kvm64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Ts
On 04/30/2012 05:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> cpuid eax should return the max leaf so that
> guests can find out the valid range.
> This matches Xen et al.
>
> Tested using -cpu kvm64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
> target-i386/kvm.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions
cpuid eax should return the max leaf so that
guests can find out the valid range.
This matches Xen et al.
Tested using -cpu kvm64.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
target-i386/kvm.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kv