On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:11:00PM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>To: Zhi Yong Wu
>Cc: Kevin Wolf , Zhi Yong Wu ,
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>x-cbid: 11103114-6148---00CC1760
>X-IBM-ISS-Spam
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
>>> It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than
>>> iov.iov_len.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The commit mess
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
>> It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than
>> iov.iov_len.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The commit message should probably say why it's better. Not saying
> otherwis
Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
> It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than
> iov.iov_len.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
The commit message should probably say why it's better. Not saying
otherwise, but I can't see the different at the first sight.
Kevin
It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than iov.iov_len.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
---
block/qed-table.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qed-table.c b/block/qed-table.c
index f31f9ff..8ee8443 100644
--- a/block/qed-tabl