Eric Blake writes:
> On 02/02/2016 01:04 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on sparc, which has a preprocessor
>>> pollution of '#define sparc 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
>>> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains back
On 02/02/2016 01:04 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on sparc, which has a preprocessor
>> pollution of '#define sparc 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
>> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
>> and only
Eric Blake writes:
> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on sparc, which has a preprocessor
> pollution of '#define sparc 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
> and only the C code needs to use the alternative 'q_sparc' spelli
Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on sparc, which has a preprocessor
pollution of '#define sparc 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
and only the C code needs to use the alternative 'q_sparc' spelling.
CC: Peter Maydell
Signe
