On 2 February 2016 at 17:45, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 10:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 February 2016 at 14:51, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on MIPS, which has a preprocessor
>>> pollution of '#define mips 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
>>> the po
On 02/02/2016 10:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 February 2016 at 14:51, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on MIPS, which has a preprocessor
>> pollution of '#define mips 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
>> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards com
On 2 February 2016 at 14:51, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on MIPS, which has a preprocessor
> pollution of '#define mips 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
> and only the C code needs to use the alt
Eric Blake writes:
> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on MIPS, which has a preprocessor
> pollution of '#define mips 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
> and only the C code needs to use the alternative 'q_mips' spelling.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:51:41AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on MIPS, which has a preprocessor
> pollution of '#define mips 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
> the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
> and only the C code needs to
Commit 86f4b687 broke compilation on MIPS, which has a preprocessor
pollution of '#define mips 1'. Treat it the same way as we do for
the pollution with 'unix', so that QMP remains backwards compatible
and only the C code needs to use the alternative 'q_mips' spelling.
CC: James Hogan
Signed-off
