On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:41:36PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 05:40 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >Am 18.07.2012 10:22, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> >>By default mingw-gcc is trying to pack structures the way to
> >>preserve binary compatibility with MS Visual C what leads to
> >>in
On 07/18/2012 05:40 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 18.07.2012 10:22, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
By default mingw-gcc is trying to pack structures the way to
preserve binary compatibility with MS Visual C what leads to
incorrect and unexpected padding in the PCI bus ranges property of
the sPAPR PHB
Am 18.07.2012 10:22, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
By default mingw-gcc is trying to pack structures the way to
preserve binary compatibility with MS Visual C what leads to
incorrect and unexpected padding in the PCI bus ranges property of
the sPAPR PHB.
The patch replaces __attribute__((packed)
By default mingw-gcc is trying to pack structures the way to
preserve binary compatibility with MS Visual C what leads to
incorrect and unexpected padding in the PCI bus ranges property of
the sPAPR PHB.
The patch replaces __attribute__((packed)) with more strict QEMU_PACKED
which actually is __at