On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> > In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> > priority order:
> >
> > IOMMU > PCI Devices
> >
> > When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pc
On 02/02/2018 11:56, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:51:31PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>> In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
>>> priority order:
>>>
>>> IOMMU > PCI Devices
>>>
>>> When migrating a
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
[...]
> Root ports can't be nested, anyway, I suppose the migration should
> follow the bus numbering order.
Could I ask whether this is a must? And if yes, why?
>
> The question now is what happens if the migration is happenin
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:51:31PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> > priority order:
> >
> > IOMMU > PCI Devices
> >
> > When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pcie-root-
On 02/02/2018 12:04, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Root ports can't be nested, anyway, I suppose the migration should
>> follow the bus numbering order.
>
> Could I ask whether this is a must? And if yes, why?
>
Not sure. Th
* Marcel Apfelbaum (mar...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 01/02/2018 21:48, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >>> Hi Peter,
> >>>
> >>> On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> In the
On 01/02/2018 21:48, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
* Michael S. Tsirkin (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> > > priority order:
> > >
> > > IOMMU > PCI D
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> priority order:
>
> IOMMU > PCI Devices
>
> When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pcie-root-port, we'll always
> migrate vIOMMU first, since pcie-root-port will be seen to have t
* Marcel Apfelbaum (mar...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> > In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> > priority order:
> >
> > IOMMU > PCI Devices
> >
> > When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pcie-root-port, we'll
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:24:15PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> > In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> > priority order:
> >
> > IOMMU > PCI Devices
> >
> > When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pc
In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
priority order:
IOMMU > PCI Devices
When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pcie-root-port, we'll always
migrate vIOMMU first, since pcie-root-port will be seen to have the same
priority of general PCI devices.
That's pro
Hi Peter,
On 01/02/2018 13:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> In the past, we prioritized IOMMU migration so that we have such a
> priority order:
>
> IOMMU > PCI Devices
>
> When migrating a guest with both vIOMMU and pcie-root-port, we'll always
> migrate vIOMMU first, since pcie-root-port will be seen
13 matches
Mail list logo