On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 21:50 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:39:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 09:19 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > he current code walks up the bus tree for an iommu, however it
> > > passes
> > > to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:39:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 09:19 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > he current code walks up the bus tree for an iommu, however it passes
> > to the iommu_fn() callback the bus/devfn of the immediate child of
> > the level w
On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 09:19 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> he current code walks up the bus tree for an iommu, however it passes
> to the iommu_fn() callback the bus/devfn of the immediate child of
> the level where the callback was found, rather than the original
> bus/devfn where the sear
he current code walks up the bus tree for an iommu, however it passes
to the iommu_fn() callback the bus/devfn of the immediate child of
the level where the callback was found, rather than the original
bus/devfn where the search started from.
This prevents iommu's like POWER8 (and in fact also Q35
